https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239509 The Tribunal upheld the impugned order confirming central excise duty, directing the appellant to deposit the entire duty amount within a specified timeframe. The dismissal of the stay petition by the Supreme Court affirmed the Larger Bench decision, establishing the operative legal position. The Commissioner's re-quantification of the demand aligned with the remand order, emphasizing compliance with the legal interpretation. The Tribunal rejected the appellant's plea for dispensation with the pre-deposit condition, emphasizing adherence to the established legal position and subsequent orders. en-us Mon, 14 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Nov 2013 21:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239509 The Tribunal upheld the impugned order confirming central excise duty, directing the appellant to deposit the entire duty amount within a specified timeframe. The dismissal of the stay petition by the Supreme Court affirmed the Larger Bench decision, establishing the operative legal position. The Commissioner's re-quantification of the demand aligned with the remand order, emphasizing compliance with the legal interpretation. The Tribunal rejected the appellant's plea for dispensation with the pre-deposit condition, emphasizing adherence to the established legal position and subsequent orders. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 14 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239509