https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239508 The Tribunal set aside all three impugned orders, allowing the appeals with consequential relief to the appellants. The judgment emphasized the need for concrete and admissible evidence to substantiate allegations of under-valuation and clandestine activities, the importance of cross-examination to test the veracity of statements, and the requirement to consider all evidence collected during investigations to ensure fair adjudication. en-us Mon, 29 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 May 2015 14:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239508 The Tribunal set aside all three impugned orders, allowing the appeals with consequential relief to the appellants. The judgment emphasized the need for concrete and admissible evidence to substantiate allegations of under-valuation and clandestine activities, the importance of cross-examination to test the veracity of statements, and the requirement to consider all evidence collected during investigations to ensure fair adjudication. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 29 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239508