<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 608 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159102</link>
    <description>A penalty for alleged tax evasion under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act cannot stand unless the authority considers the relevant transport and purchase documents and records findings on the foundational facts showing liability and wilful evasion. Where documents produced before the Intelligence Officer indicated that the goods originated outside the State and were meant for processing, and those materials were not examined by the original or appellate authority, the penalty was set aside. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration of whether the goods were purchased within Kerala and whether the statutory conditions for security and penalty were actually satisfied after both sides were heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:33:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 608 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159102</link>
      <description>A penalty for alleged tax evasion under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act cannot stand unless the authority considers the relevant transport and purchase documents and records findings on the foundational facts showing liability and wilful evasion. Where documents produced before the Intelligence Officer indicated that the goods originated outside the State and were meant for processing, and those materials were not examined by the original or appellate authority, the penalty was set aside. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration of whether the goods were purchased within Kerala and whether the statutory conditions for security and penalty were actually satisfied after both sides were heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>