<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (11) TMI 440 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159092</link>
    <description>Interim protection against recovery from the petitioner&#039;s bank accounts was continued pending disposal of the assessment appeals because the petitioner showed a prima facie case, faced irreparable injury if protection was withdrawn, and the balance of convenience favoured maintaining the stay; the Tribunal also noted that tax was already being deducted at source. The Commissioner&#039;s transfer order was treated as an administrative exercise of statutory power transferring the case between assessing circles and was not found to prejudice the appeals on the merits, so the request to quash it was rejected. The pending appeals were left to be decided independently on their own merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:18:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (11) TMI 440 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159092</link>
      <description>Interim protection against recovery from the petitioner&#039;s bank accounts was continued pending disposal of the assessment appeals because the petitioner showed a prima facie case, faced irreparable injury if protection was withdrawn, and the balance of convenience favoured maintaining the stay; the Tribunal also noted that tax was already being deducted at source. The Commissioner&#039;s transfer order was treated as an administrative exercise of statutory power transferring the case between assessing circles and was not found to prejudice the appeals on the merits, so the request to quash it was rejected. The pending appeals were left to be decided independently on their own merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>