<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (8) TMI 457 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159091</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order of remand and the penalty imposed by taxing authorities on assessee-dealers. It was held that using goods purchased on &quot;C&quot; forms for job-work for third parties did not violate Section 10 of the CST Act. The Court decided against remitting the matter back to the Tribunal to prevent further delay and prejudice to the dealers. The petition was allowed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:14:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (8) TMI 457 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159091</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order of remand and the penalty imposed by taxing authorities on assessee-dealers. It was held that using goods purchased on &quot;C&quot; forms for job-work for third parties did not violate Section 10 of the CST Act. The Court decided against remitting the matter back to the Tribunal to prevent further delay and prejudice to the dealers. The petition was allowed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>