<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 494 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159089</link>
    <description>An expanded small-scale industrial unit certified as a medium industrial unit remained entitled to deferment of sales tax under the industrial incentive notification. The Orissa HC read the notification issued under section 7 of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947, together with S.R.O. No. 790/90 dated 16.08.1990, and held that the incentive scheme could not be applied so narrowly as to exclude an expanded SSI unit that had become a medium unit and was duly certified by the competent authority. Deferment of tax was treated as one of the benefits flowing from the I.P.R. incentives, so the orders denying that benefit were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:09:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 494 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159089</link>
      <description>An expanded small-scale industrial unit certified as a medium industrial unit remained entitled to deferment of sales tax under the industrial incentive notification. The Orissa HC read the notification issued under section 7 of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947, together with S.R.O. No. 790/90 dated 16.08.1990, and held that the incentive scheme could not be applied so narrowly as to exclude an expanded SSI unit that had become a medium unit and was duly certified by the competent authority. Deferment of tax was treated as one of the benefits flowing from the I.P.R. incentives, so the orders denying that benefit were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>