<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 545 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159085</link>
    <description>Batteries manufactured by the assessee were treated as eligible for concessional duty because the relevant Government Order broadly covered electronic goods and expressly incorporated an external clarification and list prepared by the Electronics Commission. That incorporated list specifically placed batteries under electronic components, so the concession extended to the assessee&#039;s products. The same interpretation applied to the corresponding Government Order under the Central Sales Tax Act because the listed items were identical. The Revenue failed to dislodge the Tribunal&#039;s view, and the tax revision cases were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:56:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 545 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159085</link>
      <description>Batteries manufactured by the assessee were treated as eligible for concessional duty because the relevant Government Order broadly covered electronic goods and expressly incorporated an external clarification and list prepared by the Electronics Commission. That incorporated list specifically placed batteries under electronic components, so the concession extended to the assessee&#039;s products. The same interpretation applied to the corresponding Government Order under the Central Sales Tax Act because the listed items were identical. The Revenue failed to dislodge the Tribunal&#039;s view, and the tax revision cases were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>