<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 676 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239499</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for both assessment years, upholding the CIT (A)&#039;s decisions to delete the disallowances of Rs.15.5 lakhs, Rs.51,87,552/-, and Rs.16,56,73,063/-. The Tribunal found that the advances were made for business purposes and commercial expediency, in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment in S.A. Builders v. CIT.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 676 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239499</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for both assessment years, upholding the CIT (A)&#039;s decisions to delete the disallowances of Rs.15.5 lakhs, Rs.51,87,552/-, and Rs.16,56,73,063/-. The Tribunal found that the advances were made for business purposes and commercial expediency, in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment in S.A. Builders v. CIT.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>