<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 669 - ITAT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239492</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, upholding the reopening of the assessment and the application of Section 50C for computing capital gains. However, it directed the Assessing Officer to recompute long-term capital gains considering the proportionate exemption under Section 54EC(1)(b), emphasizing that an artificial split of transactions for better benefits is impermissible. The matter was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for proper computation in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 08:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 669 - ITAT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239492</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, upholding the reopening of the assessment and the application of Section 50C for computing capital gains. However, it directed the Assessing Officer to recompute long-term capital gains considering the proportionate exemption under Section 54EC(1)(b), emphasizing that an artificial split of transactions for better benefits is impermissible. The matter was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for proper computation in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>