https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159074 The Court declined to entertain the writ petition challenging a reassessment order under the A.P. General Sales Tax Act for the assessment year 1992-93, emphasizing the availability of alternative remedies like appeal and revision. It highlighted the need to refrain from interfering in tax matters where statutory remedies exist, stating that Article 226 should only be invoked in exceptional circumstances. Despite dismissing the petition, the Court granted a one-month stay on tax recovery, allowed an appeal within two weeks, and mandated appeal disposal within three months, without imposing costs. en-us Fri, 22 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Nov 2013 18:38:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159074 The Court declined to entertain the writ petition challenging a reassessment order under the A.P. General Sales Tax Act for the assessment year 1992-93, emphasizing the availability of alternative remedies like appeal and revision. It highlighted the need to refrain from interfering in tax matters where statutory remedies exist, stating that Article 226 should only be invoked in exceptional circumstances. Despite dismissing the petition, the Court granted a one-month stay on tax recovery, allowed an appeal within two weeks, and mandated appeal disposal within three months, without imposing costs. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 22 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159074