<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 634 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159070</link>
    <description>Old and discarded newspapers sold as waste paper were treated as taxable, because newspapers lose their character when sold for non-reading purposes and taxability is judged on the date of sale. The revisional order was held barred by limitation, as service occurred after an unexplained delay beyond the statutory four-year period, making the order ineffective despite its date. Withdrawal of exemption on waste paper turnover without proposing that relief in the show-cause notice violated fair hearing requirements. Although taxability was decided against the assessee, the revision failed on limitation and natural justice, so the appeal succeeded overall.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:15:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 634 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159070</link>
      <description>Old and discarded newspapers sold as waste paper were treated as taxable, because newspapers lose their character when sold for non-reading purposes and taxability is judged on the date of sale. The revisional order was held barred by limitation, as service occurred after an unexplained delay beyond the statutory four-year period, making the order ineffective despite its date. Withdrawal of exemption on waste paper turnover without proposing that relief in the show-cause notice violated fair hearing requirements. Although taxability was decided against the assessee, the revision failed on limitation and natural justice, so the appeal succeeded overall.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>