https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159065 A writ petition challenging an assessment under the Orissa Sales Tax Act was not entertained because an effective statutory appeal was available and the dispute turned mainly on factual questions about works contract turnover and tax computation. Article 226 interference was treated as exceptional, limited to cases of lack or excess of jurisdiction or breach of natural justice. As no such exceptional ground was shown, the challenge was relegated to the appellate forum, with interim directions preserving the petitioner's remedy and status quo pending appeal. en-us Tue, 10 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:16:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159065 A writ petition challenging an assessment under the Orissa Sales Tax Act was not entertained because an effective statutory appeal was available and the dispute turned mainly on factual questions about works contract turnover and tax computation. Article 226 interference was treated as exceptional, limited to cases of lack or excess of jurisdiction or breach of natural justice. As no such exceptional ground was shown, the challenge was relegated to the appellate forum, with interim directions preserving the petitioner's remedy and status quo pending appeal. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 10 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159065