<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 492 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159059</link>
    <description>The court quashed the retrospective modification of the eligibility certificate without a hearing, emphasizing the importance of due process. Referring to relevant case law, the court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the modification was unjust and ordering its quashment. The petitioner was entitled to the benefits granted under the original eligibility certificate, with each party bearing their own costs and any security deposit refunded to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:50:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 492 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159059</link>
      <description>The court quashed the retrospective modification of the eligibility certificate without a hearing, emphasizing the importance of due process. Referring to relevant case law, the court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the modification was unjust and ordering its quashment. The petitioner was entitled to the benefits granted under the original eligibility certificate, with each party bearing their own costs and any security deposit refunded to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>