<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 633 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239456</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai ruled that the applicant, accused of transferring fake DEPB licenses without knowledge, failed to establish a prima facie case for waiving the penalty. The tribunal upheld the penalty of Rs. 8 lakhs imposed by the original authority in each case, directing the applicant to deposit Rs. 2,00,000/- within six weeks for each application to comply with the ruling. Compliance reporting was mandated by a specified date to ensure adherence to the deposit requirement within the given timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 21:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 633 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239456</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai ruled that the applicant, accused of transferring fake DEPB licenses without knowledge, failed to establish a prima facie case for waiving the penalty. The tribunal upheld the penalty of Rs. 8 lakhs imposed by the original authority in each case, directing the applicant to deposit Rs. 2,00,000/- within six weeks for each application to comply with the ruling. Compliance reporting was mandated by a specified date to ensure adherence to the deposit requirement within the given timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>