<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 630 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239453</link>
    <description>The judgment allowed the application to rectify deficiency in court fee. The appeal challenging the Tribunal&#039;s order was dismissed due to delay in filing the appeal as directed by the Committee of Chief Commissioners. The Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to condone the delay in the reviewing authority&#039;s order, in line with statutory provisions and Supreme Court precedent. The appeal was dismissed as no error was found in the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 12:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 630 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239453</link>
      <description>The judgment allowed the application to rectify deficiency in court fee. The appeal challenging the Tribunal&#039;s order was dismissed due to delay in filing the appeal as directed by the Committee of Chief Commissioners. The Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to condone the delay in the reviewing authority&#039;s order, in line with statutory provisions and Supreme Court precedent. The appeal was dismissed as no error was found in the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>