<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 628 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239451</link>
    <description>The appeal was partially allowed by the tribunal, reducing the duty demand, redemption fines, and penalties. The judgment stressed the significance of proper documentation and accounting to comply with excise duty regulations. The penalty under Section 11AC was upheld but reduced, while the penalty under Rule 27 was set aside. The duty demand was decreased to Rs.63,926/-, redemption fines were adjusted, and the total penalty amount was Rs.15,982/-.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 21:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 628 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239451</link>
      <description>The appeal was partially allowed by the tribunal, reducing the duty demand, redemption fines, and penalties. The judgment stressed the significance of proper documentation and accounting to comply with excise duty regulations. The penalty under Section 11AC was upheld but reduced, while the penalty under Rule 27 was set aside. The duty demand was decreased to Rs.63,926/-, redemption fines were adjusted, and the total penalty amount was Rs.15,982/-.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>