<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 627 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239450</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted a stay against the impugned order concerning the interpretation of Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 for cash refund of unutilized credit, pending final disposal of the appeal. The case involved conflicting precedents on cash refund for unutilized credits, with the Tribunal opting to preserve the respondent&#039;s right to refund until a conclusive resolution is reached.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 21:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 627 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239450</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted a stay against the impugned order concerning the interpretation of Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 for cash refund of unutilized credit, pending final disposal of the appeal. The case involved conflicting precedents on cash refund for unutilized credits, with the Tribunal opting to preserve the respondent&#039;s right to refund until a conclusive resolution is reached.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>