<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 626 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239449</link>
    <description>CESTAT Ahmedabad set aside duty demand against assessee in clandestine manufacture case. Tribunal held adjudicating authority violated natural justice principles by denying cross-examination of witnesses whose statements were relied upon, following SC precedent. Duty demand based on assumptions and presumptions without concrete evidence was deemed illegal. Mere seizure of documents, employee statements, and vehicle discrepancies insufficient to establish clandestine manufacture and clearance. Department failed to produce tangible evidence linking documents to actual manufacturing operations or corroborative proof of clearance to identified parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 14:43:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 626 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239449</link>
      <description>CESTAT Ahmedabad set aside duty demand against assessee in clandestine manufacture case. Tribunal held adjudicating authority violated natural justice principles by denying cross-examination of witnesses whose statements were relied upon, following SC precedent. Duty demand based on assumptions and presumptions without concrete evidence was deemed illegal. Mere seizure of documents, employee statements, and vehicle discrepancies insufficient to establish clandestine manufacture and clearance. Department failed to produce tangible evidence linking documents to actual manufacturing operations or corroborative proof of clearance to identified parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>