<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 514 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159045</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the tax revision case, criticizing the authorities for not objectively considering the objections raised by the assessee. The Court found most defects in maintaining accounts were general or technical, with no evidence of suppression in purchases or sales. As a result, the previous orders were quashed, and the assessing authority was directed to accept the return and accounts for proper assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 17:30:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 514 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159045</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the tax revision case, criticizing the authorities for not objectively considering the objections raised by the assessee. The Court found most defects in maintaining accounts were general or technical, with no evidence of suppression in purchases or sales. As a result, the previous orders were quashed, and the assessing authority was directed to accept the return and accounts for proper assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>