<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 480 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159039</link>
    <description>For sales tax classification, the true character of a product is determined by its common parlance identity, constituents, actual use and market acceptance, not by the manufacturer&#039;s label or licences under other laws. Applying that test, the tribunal found no reliable evidence of authoritative Ayurvedic formulation, product literature, medical recommendation, trade acceptance as medicine or clinical trials showing curative value. The claim that the goods were sugar was also rejected. On that basis, &quot;Swad&quot; tablets were treated as a confectionery article rather than an ayurvedic medicine, and tax at the residuary rate was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 16:51:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 480 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159039</link>
      <description>For sales tax classification, the true character of a product is determined by its common parlance identity, constituents, actual use and market acceptance, not by the manufacturer&#039;s label or licences under other laws. Applying that test, the tribunal found no reliable evidence of authoritative Ayurvedic formulation, product literature, medical recommendation, trade acceptance as medicine or clinical trials showing curative value. The claim that the goods were sugar was also rejected. On that basis, &quot;Swad&quot; tablets were treated as a confectionery article rather than an ayurvedic medicine, and tax at the residuary rate was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>