<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 369 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159030</link>
    <description>The High Court partially allowed the revision in penalty proceedings under the U.P. Sales Tax Act, emphasizing the need to consider all relevant aspects and legal provisions. The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order due to a lack of thorough analysis, directing a fresh consideration to address overlooked details and ensure a comprehensive decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 16:01:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 369 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159030</link>
      <description>The High Court partially allowed the revision in penalty proceedings under the U.P. Sales Tax Act, emphasizing the need to consider all relevant aspects and legal provisions. The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order due to a lack of thorough analysis, directing a fresh consideration to address overlooked details and ensure a comprehensive decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>