<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 533 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159028</link>
    <description>The revisional authority under the Haryana General Sales Tax Act and Rule 28A could not indirectly cancel or modify an eligibility certificate or exemption certificate issued by the competent authorities under the industrial incentive scheme. The power to grant, cancel, or withdraw the eligibility certificate lay with the screening committee, and the power to issue or cancel the exemption certificate lay with the Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner. As the withdrawal of exemption was without jurisdiction, no enforceable tax demand survived and interest could not be levied on the notional liability. The exemption position granted by the competent authorities was therefore restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 15:56:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 533 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159028</link>
      <description>The revisional authority under the Haryana General Sales Tax Act and Rule 28A could not indirectly cancel or modify an eligibility certificate or exemption certificate issued by the competent authorities under the industrial incentive scheme. The power to grant, cancel, or withdraw the eligibility certificate lay with the screening committee, and the power to issue or cancel the exemption certificate lay with the Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner. As the withdrawal of exemption was without jurisdiction, no enforceable tax demand survived and interest could not be levied on the notional liability. The exemption position granted by the competent authorities was therefore restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>