<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 366 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159023</link>
    <description>The Court held that a joint petition for multiple assessment years was maintainable as the petitioner did not abandon subsequent years&#039; claims. Condonation of delay was granted due to no culpable negligence, ensuring substantial justice prevailed over technicalities. Refusal to condone the delay would have led to a meritorious matter&#039;s dismissal, impacting justice. Emphasizing a justice-oriented approach, the Court directed the Tribunal to refer the legal question for the Court&#039;s opinion, highlighting the importance of fair legal proceedings for the collective community&#039;s benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 15:35:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 366 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159023</link>
      <description>The Court held that a joint petition for multiple assessment years was maintainable as the petitioner did not abandon subsequent years&#039; claims. Condonation of delay was granted due to no culpable negligence, ensuring substantial justice prevailed over technicalities. Refusal to condone the delay would have led to a meritorious matter&#039;s dismissal, impacting justice. Emphasizing a justice-oriented approach, the Court directed the Tribunal to refer the legal question for the Court&#039;s opinion, highlighting the importance of fair legal proceedings for the collective community&#039;s benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159023</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>