<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 604 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239427</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed a service tax demand of Rs.1,55,15,920/- against the appellant, along with interest and penalties under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1944. The Tribunal deferred addressing the service tax demands related to the sale of space for advertisement and renting of immovable property for hospitality boxes, acknowledging certain limitations and arguments presented by the appellant. However, in the case of service tax demand for event management services, the Tribunal found merit in the appellant&#039;s argument and granted a waiver of pre-deposit and a stay against recovery during the appeal&#039;s pendency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 604 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239427</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed a service tax demand of Rs.1,55,15,920/- against the appellant, along with interest and penalties under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1944. The Tribunal deferred addressing the service tax demands related to the sale of space for advertisement and renting of immovable property for hospitality boxes, acknowledging certain limitations and arguments presented by the appellant. However, in the case of service tax demand for event management services, the Tribunal found merit in the appellant&#039;s argument and granted a waiver of pre-deposit and a stay against recovery during the appeal&#039;s pendency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>