<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 581 - ITAT  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159006</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee on both issues. Regarding the working out of capital gains from the sale of a depreciable asset, the Tribunal permitted the adjustment of the cost of a newly acquired asset against the sale consideration without the precondition of business usage. The disallowance of interest payments was also overturned, as the Tribunal found no established nexus between the borrowed funds and the interest-free advances made by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 10:59:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 581 - ITAT  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159006</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee on both issues. Regarding the working out of capital gains from the sale of a depreciable asset, the Tribunal permitted the adjustment of the cost of a newly acquired asset against the sale consideration without the precondition of business usage. The disallowance of interest payments was also overturned, as the Tribunal found no established nexus between the borrowed funds and the interest-free advances made by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>