https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239424 The Tribunal upheld the demand for differential duty on light-weight coated paper weighing 72 g/m2, as it exceeded the prescribed limit of 70 g/m2 under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. The appellant's challenge against the differential duty demand and refund claim for CVD payment were dismissed, emphasizing the importance of meeting the specific criteria outlined in the notification. The Tribunal distinguished a previous decision where conflicting test reports and specific claims were present, finding the appellant's case lacking such evidence. Compliance with the notification's parameters was deemed essential, leading to the sustained demand for differential duty. en-us Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Nov 2013 11:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239424 The Tribunal upheld the demand for differential duty on light-weight coated paper weighing 72 g/m2, as it exceeded the prescribed limit of 70 g/m2 under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. The appellant's challenge against the differential duty demand and refund claim for CVD payment were dismissed, emphasizing the importance of meeting the specific criteria outlined in the notification. The Tribunal distinguished a previous decision where conflicting test reports and specific claims were present, finding the appellant's case lacking such evidence. Compliance with the notification's parameters was deemed essential, leading to the sustained demand for differential duty. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239424