<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 600 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239423</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that Stainless Steel Cold Rolled coils with a width exceeding 1250 MM were not subject to anti-dumping duty under Notification 86/2011. As the goods in question fell within the range of 1256 MM to 1259 MM, the Tribunal found the notification inapplicable, setting aside the order and ruling in favor of the appellant. The decision emphasized interpreting notifications within their specified limits to prevent duty circumvention, supporting the appellant&#039;s argument on the width threshold for duty applicability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 600 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239423</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that Stainless Steel Cold Rolled coils with a width exceeding 1250 MM were not subject to anti-dumping duty under Notification 86/2011. As the goods in question fell within the range of 1256 MM to 1259 MM, the Tribunal found the notification inapplicable, setting aside the order and ruling in favor of the appellant. The decision emphasized interpreting notifications within their specified limits to prevent duty circumvention, supporting the appellant&#039;s argument on the width threshold for duty applicability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>