<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 587 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239410</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi granted stay on the recovery of a penalty of Rs.2,00,000 imposed on M/s. Noble Modules Pvt. Ltd. under Rule 173Q of Central Excise Rules, 1944. The penalty was deemed incorrectly imposed for the removal of excisable goods instead of inputs for which credit was taken. Waiver of pre-deposit was allowed pending appeal disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335458" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 587 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239410</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi granted stay on the recovery of a penalty of Rs.2,00,000 imposed on M/s. Noble Modules Pvt. Ltd. under Rule 173Q of Central Excise Rules, 1944. The penalty was deemed incorrectly imposed for the removal of excisable goods instead of inputs for which credit was taken. Waiver of pre-deposit was allowed pending appeal disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>