<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 579 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239402</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, a company of the State Government, allowing the deduction under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act for provision of interest liability on loans received from the State Government, even though the interest had not been paid but was accounted for in the books. The Court held that under the mercantile system of accounting, the provision for payable interest sufficed for claiming the deduction. The Court dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision to permit the deduction on an unpaid basis, rejecting the argument that only paid interest could be deducted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 09:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 579 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239402</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, a company of the State Government, allowing the deduction under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act for provision of interest liability on loans received from the State Government, even though the interest had not been paid but was accounted for in the books. The Court held that under the mercantile system of accounting, the provision for payable interest sufficed for claiming the deduction. The Court dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision to permit the deduction on an unpaid basis, rejecting the argument that only paid interest could be deducted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>