<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 577 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239400</link>
    <description>The court allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, setting aside the order of the learned Single Judge, and upheld the assessment order dated 30.06.2005 as within the limitation period. The writ petitions challenging the recovery proceedings were dismissed, and the petitioner was directed to seek remedies through the appropriate legal channels.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 12:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 577 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239400</link>
      <description>The court allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, setting aside the order of the learned Single Judge, and upheld the assessment order dated 30.06.2005 as within the limitation period. The writ petitions challenging the recovery proceedings were dismissed, and the petitioner was directed to seek remedies through the appropriate legal channels.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>