https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159003 The court dismissed the petitioner's writ petition seeking concession to pay sales tax arrears in installments, similar to another industry, emphasizing that concessions granted to the other industry were to prevent closure due to financial distress, not exemptions or reductions in sales tax rates. The court held that concessions are not a matter of right and cannot be demanded based on equal treatment principles. The petitioner's comparison with the other industry did not warrant similar treatment, and the court ruled in favor of the government, stating that neither article 14 nor article 301 of the Constitution supported the petitioner's claims. en-us Thu, 27 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:47:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159003 The court dismissed the petitioner's writ petition seeking concession to pay sales tax arrears in installments, similar to another industry, emphasizing that concessions granted to the other industry were to prevent closure due to financial distress, not exemptions or reductions in sales tax rates. The court held that concessions are not a matter of right and cannot be demanded based on equal treatment principles. The petitioner's comparison with the other industry did not warrant similar treatment, and the court ruled in favor of the government, stating that neither article 14 nor article 301 of the Constitution supported the petitioner's claims. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 27 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159003