<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (5) TMI 403 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT]</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159002</link>
    <description>The Court directed the Tribunal to refer the question of law regarding whether penalties under section 10(7) of the Punjab Act should be based on the original or revised return. This decision aimed to ensure consistency in penalty imposition by clarifying the correct interpretation of the statute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:45:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (5) TMI 403 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT]</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159002</link>
      <description>The Court directed the Tribunal to refer the question of law regarding whether penalties under section 10(7) of the Punjab Act should be based on the original or revised return. This decision aimed to ensure consistency in penalty imposition by clarifying the correct interpretation of the statute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>