<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (6) TMI 337 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159001</link>
    <description>Section 9(2) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 applies only when a dealer transfers ownership of part of its business. A temporary arrangement allowing a sister concern to run and operate the factory for a fixed period, while the dealer retained the essential incidents of ownership, did not satisfy that requirement. The agreement covered only stock and operational control during the arrangement and did not transfer land, buildings, fixed capital, liabilities, account books, employees, goodwill, or the power to consume, destroy or alienate the business. Transfer of stock alone was insufficient, so the transaction was outside section 9(2) and the dealer remained liable to tax on the tractor spares.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:32:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (6) TMI 337 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159001</link>
      <description>Section 9(2) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 applies only when a dealer transfers ownership of part of its business. A temporary arrangement allowing a sister concern to run and operate the factory for a fixed period, while the dealer retained the essential incidents of ownership, did not satisfy that requirement. The agreement covered only stock and operational control during the arrangement and did not transfer land, buildings, fixed capital, liabilities, account books, employees, goodwill, or the power to consume, destroy or alienate the business. Transfer of stock alone was insufficient, so the transaction was outside section 9(2) and the dealer remained liable to tax on the tractor spares.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>