<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 499 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158998</link>
    <description>The Court directed the Tribunal to refer the question of legality in imposing a penalty under section 36(6) of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act when there is a shortage of stocks compared to the stock register to the High Court for clarification. The application was allowed, and the reference was ordered, emphasizing the need for judicial review to resolve legal ambiguities in penalty provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:23:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 499 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158998</link>
      <description>The Court directed the Tribunal to refer the question of legality in imposing a penalty under section 36(6) of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act when there is a shortage of stocks compared to the stock register to the High Court for clarification. The application was allowed, and the reference was ordered, emphasizing the need for judicial review to resolve legal ambiguities in penalty provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>