https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158994 A pure finding that the assessee had proved expansion under the Sales Tax New Incentive Scheme, 1989, did not raise a question of law where the Tax Board had examined the facts and figures and the relevant figures were not shown to have been doubted by the State Level Screening Committee. In revision under section 86(3) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994, interference was unwarranted absent any legal error or perversity, so the finding of expansion and entitlement to incentive benefit was upheld and the revision failed. en-us Tue, 13 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:10:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158994 A pure finding that the assessee had proved expansion under the Sales Tax New Incentive Scheme, 1989, did not raise a question of law where the Tax Board had examined the facts and figures and the relevant figures were not shown to have been doubted by the State Level Screening Committee. In revision under section 86(3) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994, interference was unwarranted absent any legal error or perversity, so the finding of expansion and entitlement to incentive benefit was upheld and the revision failed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 13 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158994