<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (5) TMI 257 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158993</link>
    <description>Where goods are detained and penalty is proposed under section 14-B(7) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, the authority must follow the prescribed procedure and comply with natural justice before fixing liability. If the claimant asserts ownership and has furnished a bank guarantee for release, notice must be issued to both the claimant and the consignee, and their versions must be heard before ownership and penalty liability are decided. The impugned procedure was treated as irregular, and the matter was sent back for fresh decision after notice and hearing, with consequential refund of the encashed bank guarantee if no penalty is ultimately leviable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:02:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (5) TMI 257 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158993</link>
      <description>Where goods are detained and penalty is proposed under section 14-B(7) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, the authority must follow the prescribed procedure and comply with natural justice before fixing liability. If the claimant asserts ownership and has furnished a bank guarantee for release, notice must be issued to both the claimant and the consignee, and their versions must be heard before ownership and penalty liability are decided. The impugned procedure was treated as irregular, and the matter was sent back for fresh decision after notice and hearing, with consequential refund of the encashed bank guarantee if no penalty is ultimately leviable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>