<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (8) TMI 296 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158989</link>
    <description>The court upheld the constitutionality of the amendments and the retrospective application of the tax provisions. The petitioners were held liable to pay purchase tax on paddy used for exporting rice, but the demand for interest was quashed due to the bona fide dispute over tax liability. The notice issued u/s 40 was deemed valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:41:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (8) TMI 296 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158989</link>
      <description>The court upheld the constitutionality of the amendments and the retrospective application of the tax provisions. The petitioners were held liable to pay purchase tax on paddy used for exporting rice, but the demand for interest was quashed due to the bona fide dispute over tax liability. The notice issued u/s 40 was deemed valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>