<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (7) TMI 409 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158982</link>
    <description>Best judgment assessment requires turnover estimates to rest on cogent material and rational considerations, not conjecture or extrapolation from a brief sales survey. For perishable consumable goods, sales patterns must be assessed against market realities, and past assessment history remains a relevant factor in fixing a reasonable figure. Applying these principles, the Tribunal&#039;s turnover estimate was found arbitrary because no adequate basis was shown for fixing turnover at more than double the immediately preceding accepted figure. The matter was remanded for fresh determination after giving the assessee an opportunity to place relevant material on record, and the request for enhancement was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:59:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (7) TMI 409 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158982</link>
      <description>Best judgment assessment requires turnover estimates to rest on cogent material and rational considerations, not conjecture or extrapolation from a brief sales survey. For perishable consumable goods, sales patterns must be assessed against market realities, and past assessment history remains a relevant factor in fixing a reasonable figure. Applying these principles, the Tribunal&#039;s turnover estimate was found arbitrary because no adequate basis was shown for fixing turnover at more than double the immediately preceding accepted figure. The matter was remanded for fresh determination after giving the assessee an opportunity to place relevant material on record, and the request for enhancement was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>