<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 530 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158978</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the writ petition, finding no violation of Section 22 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act or Rule 58 of the Rules, no requirement for prior notice before composition under Section 16(6), the recovered penalty amount was legitimate, the affidavit filed by Non-petitioner No. 3 was credible, and a previous Tribunal judgment was deemed inapplicable. Each party was directed to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:43:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 530 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158978</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the writ petition, finding no violation of Section 22 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act or Rule 58 of the Rules, no requirement for prior notice before composition under Section 16(6), the recovered penalty amount was legitimate, the affidavit filed by Non-petitioner No. 3 was credible, and a previous Tribunal judgment was deemed inapplicable. Each party was directed to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>