<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (11) TMI 415 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158974</link>
    <description>For limitation under the proviso to section 39(2) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958, revision proceedings commence on the date the revisional notice is issued, not on the date it is served on the assessee. Applying that binding view, the court treated the notice dated 20 April 1971 as issued within the three-year limitation period, so the revision was not time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 18:21:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (11) TMI 415 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158974</link>
      <description>For limitation under the proviso to section 39(2) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958, revision proceedings commence on the date the revisional notice is issued, not on the date it is served on the assessee. Applying that binding view, the court treated the notice dated 20 April 1971 as issued within the three-year limitation period, so the revision was not time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>