https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239385 The Tribunal's remand of the matter to the Commissioner for fresh consideration in light of the retrospective amendment to section 24 of the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965 was left undisturbed, because all issues were kept open and the matter was restored for a fresh decision. In that situation, the High Court found no basis to examine the proposed questions of law at that stage, and noted that the Revenue could raise them again after the fresh order if necessary. Accordingly, no interference was called for with the remand order, and the appeal was dismissed. en-us Tue, 13 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239385 The Tribunal's remand of the matter to the Commissioner for fresh consideration in light of the retrospective amendment to section 24 of the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965 was left undisturbed, because all issues were kept open and the matter was restored for a fresh decision. In that situation, the High Court found no basis to examine the proposed questions of law at that stage, and noted that the Revenue could raise them again after the fresh order if necessary. Accordingly, no interference was called for with the remand order, and the appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 13 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239385