<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 552 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239375</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, an Engineer engaged in surveyor/loss assessor profession, regarding service tax liability. The Tribunal set aside the Revenue&#039;s decision, citing a High Court judgment and a relevant Circular. It was clarified that services provided by qualified engineers in insurance survey or loss assessment do not constitute &quot;Consulting Engineer Services&quot; for service tax purposes. The decision emphasized the distinction between insurance auxiliary services and consulting engineering services, ensuring the appellant&#039;s activities were not subject to service tax under the category of &quot;Consulting Engineer.&quot;</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 18:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 552 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239375</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, an Engineer engaged in surveyor/loss assessor profession, regarding service tax liability. The Tribunal set aside the Revenue&#039;s decision, citing a High Court judgment and a relevant Circular. It was clarified that services provided by qualified engineers in insurance survey or loss assessment do not constitute &quot;Consulting Engineer Services&quot; for service tax purposes. The decision emphasized the distinction between insurance auxiliary services and consulting engineering services, ensuring the appellant&#039;s activities were not subject to service tax under the category of &quot;Consulting Engineer.&quot;</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>