<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 550 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239373</link>
    <description>Machining, drilling, tapping and milling of rough castings were treated on a prima facie basis as manufacture, so the activity was not classifiable as Business Auxiliary Service for the interim stay request. On that same preliminary view, the claim to exemption under Notification No. 8/2005-ST was not accepted at this stage. As the assessment was confined to waiver proceedings, pre-deposit was waived and recovery of the disputed dues was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 550 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239373</link>
      <description>Machining, drilling, tapping and milling of rough castings were treated on a prima facie basis as manufacture, so the activity was not classifiable as Business Auxiliary Service for the interim stay request. On that same preliminary view, the claim to exemption under Notification No. 8/2005-ST was not accepted at this stage. As the assessment was confined to waiver proceedings, pre-deposit was waived and recovery of the disputed dues was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>