https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239373 The Tribunal held that the processes carried out by the job worker constituted manufacturing based on legal precedents cited, contrary to the Revenue's contention that they were Business Auxiliary Services. The exemption under Notification No. 8/2005-ST was deemed inapplicable as the processed goods were exported without further manufacturing. As a result, the Tribunal admitted the appeal without pre-deposit and granted a stay on the collection of dues during the appeal process. en-us Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239373 The Tribunal held that the processes carried out by the job worker constituted manufacturing based on legal precedents cited, contrary to the Revenue's contention that they were Business Auxiliary Services. The exemption under Notification No. 8/2005-ST was deemed inapplicable as the processed goods were exported without further manufacturing. As a result, the Tribunal admitted the appeal without pre-deposit and granted a stay on the collection of dues during the appeal process. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239373