<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 549 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239372</link>
    <description>The High Court found that the cancellation of the Import Export Code without granting the petitioner an opportunity to be heard violated principles of natural justice. The Court quashed the impugned order, directing the respondent to reconsider the matter and issue a new order after allowing the petitioner to substantiate their claim within two weeks. The judgment stressed the significance of procedural fairness and prompt action by the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 549 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239372</link>
      <description>The High Court found that the cancellation of the Import Export Code without granting the petitioner an opportunity to be heard violated principles of natural justice. The Court quashed the impugned order, directing the respondent to reconsider the matter and issue a new order after allowing the petitioner to substantiate their claim within two weeks. The judgment stressed the significance of procedural fairness and prompt action by the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>