<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 547 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239370</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that duty payment for imported lipsticks should be based on transaction value under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, rather than Maximum Retail Price (MRP) obligations under the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976. The tribunal emphasized that goods weighing less than 10 grams per piece are exempt from MRP requirements, setting aside the duty payment based on MRP and granting relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2015 17:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 547 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239370</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that duty payment for imported lipsticks should be based on transaction value under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, rather than Maximum Retail Price (MRP) obligations under the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976. The tribunal emphasized that goods weighing less than 10 grams per piece are exempt from MRP requirements, setting aside the duty payment based on MRP and granting relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>