<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 542 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239365</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the injunction against the arbitration proceedings before the ICC. It concluded that the subsequent agreement dated March 8, 2002, novated the January 12, 2002 agreement, extinguishing the arbitration clause. The court affirmed its jurisdiction to entertain the suit challenging the arbitration agreement and held that the appellant had abandoned its right to arbitration by pursuing the same relief before the CLB and the Supreme Court. The issue of limitation was left to be decided on merits by the appropriate forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 542 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239365</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the injunction against the arbitration proceedings before the ICC. It concluded that the subsequent agreement dated March 8, 2002, novated the January 12, 2002 agreement, extinguishing the arbitration clause. The court affirmed its jurisdiction to entertain the suit challenging the arbitration agreement and held that the appellant had abandoned its right to arbitration by pursuing the same relief before the CLB and the Supreme Court. The issue of limitation was left to be decided on merits by the appropriate forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>