<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 542 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239365</link>
    <description>A civil court may, under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, examine at the threshold whether a foreign-seated New York Convention arbitration agreement is null, void, inoperative or incapable of being performed, and may grant injunction in a proper case. Where a later arrangement substitutes the earlier bargain, creates independent rights and liabilities, or shifts disputes to a different forum, the earlier arbitration clause may cease to apply to that transaction. Claims already finally dealt with, relinquished, or abandoned by conduct are not live arbitrable disputes. A limitation objection will not defeat the claim unless bar is patent on the record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 542 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239365</link>
      <description>A civil court may, under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, examine at the threshold whether a foreign-seated New York Convention arbitration agreement is null, void, inoperative or incapable of being performed, and may grant injunction in a proper case. Where a later arrangement substitutes the earlier bargain, creates independent rights and liabilities, or shifts disputes to a different forum, the earlier arbitration clause may cease to apply to that transaction. Claims already finally dealt with, relinquished, or abandoned by conduct are not live arbitrable disputes. A limitation objection will not defeat the claim unless bar is patent on the record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>