<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 364 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158967</link>
    <description>The petitioner&#039;s challenge against sales tax notices during a tax holiday period was dismissed by the court. The court ruled that the sales tax must be paid despite eligibility for the tax holiday. The petitioner was given four weeks to pay the demanded amount, with the possibility of recovery proceedings if the payment is not made within the specified period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:41:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 364 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158967</link>
      <description>The petitioner&#039;s challenge against sales tax notices during a tax holiday period was dismissed by the court. The court ruled that the sales tax must be paid despite eligibility for the tax holiday. The petitioner was given four weeks to pay the demanded amount, with the possibility of recovery proceedings if the payment is not made within the specified period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>