<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (6) TMI 331 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158960</link>
    <description>The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the petition in a tax revision case, finding that the revision order by the Deputy Commissioner was not barred by limitation under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957. The Court held that the limitation period was for initiating proceedings and passing a final order, concluding that the revising authority&#039;s order was timely.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:59:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (6) TMI 331 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158960</link>
      <description>The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the petition in a tax revision case, finding that the revision order by the Deputy Commissioner was not barred by limitation under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957. The Court held that the limitation period was for initiating proceedings and passing a final order, concluding that the revising authority&#039;s order was timely.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>