<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 515 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158958</link>
    <description>Where the party at whose instance a statutory reference is made fails to appear or take steps necessary for hearing, the High Court may decline to answer the reference and dismiss it in default. Applying that discretion under section 44(1) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, the Court followed its earlier rulings that non-appearance and failure to prosecute disentitle the referring party to a merits determination. Because the applicant/assessee did not prosecute the reference, the Court refused to examine the tax classification issue relating to voltage stabilizers and dismissed the reference in default, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:55:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 515 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158958</link>
      <description>Where the party at whose instance a statutory reference is made fails to appear or take steps necessary for hearing, the High Court may decline to answer the reference and dismiss it in default. Applying that discretion under section 44(1) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, the Court followed its earlier rulings that non-appearance and failure to prosecute disentitle the referring party to a merits determination. Because the applicant/assessee did not prosecute the reference, the Court refused to examine the tax classification issue relating to voltage stabilizers and dismissed the reference in default, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>