<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (5) TMI 401 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158956</link>
    <description>The court held that the Assessing Authority had properly indicated its intention to proceed with best judgment assessment within the statutory limitation period of five years as required by section 11(4) of the Act. The court concluded that the notices issued were sufficient to initiate assessment proceedings within the prescribed timeframe, ultimately ruling in favor of the department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:46:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (5) TMI 401 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158956</link>
      <description>The court held that the Assessing Authority had properly indicated its intention to proceed with best judgment assessment within the statutory limitation period of five years as required by section 11(4) of the Act. The court concluded that the notices issued were sufficient to initiate assessment proceedings within the prescribed timeframe, ultimately ruling in favor of the department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>